Agenda Inovasi Pembangunan Daerah dalam RPJMD Kabupaten Cianjur 2025–2029: Analisis Innovation Governance dan Model Penguatannya
Keywords:
Innovation Governance, Regional Innovation System, RPJMD, Kebijakan Inovasi Daerah, CianjurAbstract
Inovasi daerah semakin diakui sebagai instrumen kritis dalam mempercepat pembangunan dan meningkatkan daya saing wilayah. Namun, banyak dokumen perencanaan daerah belum secara eksplisit membangun arsitektur innovation governance yang koheren. Artikel ini bertujuan menganalisis agenda inovasi pembangunan daerah yang termuat dalam Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah (RPJMD) Kabupaten Cianjur 2025–2029, dengan fokus pada identifikasi orientasi inovasi, klaster prioritas inovasi, gap innovation governance, dan pengembangan model penguatan tata kelola inovasi daerah. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode analisis dokumen (document analysis), analisis isi (content analysis), dan pengodean tematik (thematic coding). Data primer adalah RPJMD Kabupaten Cianjur 2025–2029, sedangkan dokumen Analisis Isu Kabupaten Cianjur digunakan sebagai triangulasi. Kerangka teoretis mengintegrasikan innovation governance, regional innovation system, collaborative governance, mission-oriented innovation, dan public sector innovation. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa RPJMD Kabupaten Cianjur memuat orientasi inovasi yang beragam mencakup transformasi digital, agribisnis, pariwisata, pelayanan publik, dan reformasi birokrasi. Terdapat lima klaster prioritas inovasi daerah yang teridentifikasi. Namun, terdapat gap signifikan dalam hal kelembagaan, kolaborasi lintas aktor, integrasi kebijakan, pengukuran dampak, dan pendanaan inovasi. Artikel ini mengajukan model Territorial Innovation Governance (TIG) sebagai kerangka konseptual baru untuk memperkuat tata kelola inovasi Kabupaten Cianjur. Temuan ini memiliki implikasi kebijakan bagi Bupati, Bapperida, BRIDA, perangkat daerah, perguruan tinggi, dan pemangku kepentingan lainnya dalam membangun ekosistem inovasi daerah yang berkelanjutan.
References
Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
Asheim, B., & Isaksen, A. (2002). Regional innovation systems: The integration of local 'sticky' and global 'ubiquitous' knowledge. Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013100704794
Bappenas. (2025). Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional (RPJMN) 2025–2029. Kementerian PPN/Bappenas.
Borrás, S., & Edler, J. (2020). The roles of the state in the governance of socio-technical systems’ transformation. Research Policy, 49(5), 103971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103971
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). Mode 3 and Quadruple Helix: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3/4), 201–234. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374
Cooke, P. (1992). Regional innovation systems: Competitive regulation in the new Europe. Geoforum, 23(3), 365–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7185(92)90048-9
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Edler, J., & Fagerberg, J. (2017). Innovation policy: What, why, and how. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(1), 2–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grx001
Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Collaborative governance regimes. Georgetown University Press.
Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E., & Laranja, M. (2011). Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’ for innovation. Research Policy, 40(5), 702–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.02.005
Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present. Public Money & Management, 25(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9302.2005.00447.x
Hjalager, A. M. (2010). A review of innovation research in tourism. Tourism Management, 31(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.08.012
Howlett, M. (2015). Policy analytical capacity: The supply and demand for policy analysis in government. Policy and Society, 34(3–4), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.09.002
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Kuhlmann, S., & Rip, A. (2018). Next-generation innovation policy and grand challenges. Science and Public Policy, 45(4), 448–454. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy011
Mazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-oriented research & innovation in the European Union: A problem-solving approach to fuel innovation-led growth. European Commission. https://doi.org/10.2777/360325
Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75–86.
Moulaert, F., & Sekia, F. (2003). Territorial innovation models: A critical survey. Regional Studies, 37(3), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340032000065442
Mulgan, G. (2007). Ready or not? Taking innovation in the public sector seriously. NESTA.
Muluk, K. (2008). Knowledge management: Kunci sukses inovasi pemerintahan daerah. Bayumedia Publishing.
OECD. (2011). Regions and innovation policy. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264097803-en
OECD. (2018). Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation (4th ed.). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en
OECD. (2021). Effective innovation policies for the digital economy. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/122782b1-en
OECD. (2023). Innovation Outlook 2023: Opportunities for and resilience to major transitions. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a28e8950-en
OECD Observatory of Public Sector Innovation (OPSI). (2023). Embracing innovation in government: Global trends. OECD.
Pemerintah Kabupaten Cianjur. (2025). Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah (RPJMD) Kabupaten Cianjur Tahun 2025–2029. Peraturan Daerah Nomor 4 Tahun 2025.
Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1984). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland (3rd ed.). University of California Press.
Saldana, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34(8), 1203–1219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018
UNDP. (2022). Public sector innovation: A practical guide for government. United Nations Development Programme.
World Bank. (2023). Governing innovation for sustainable development. World Bank Publications. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1987-9
Wu, X., Ramesh, M., & Howlett, M. (2015). Policy capacity: A conceptual framework for understanding policy competences and capabilities. Policy and Society, 34(3–4), 165–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.09.001
Yogi, S., & Ikhsan, M. (2018). Inovasi daerah: Kajian komparatif penerapan UU No. 23 Tahun 2014 dan peraturan pelaksananya. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 11(2), 203–221.
Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M., Jimenez-Saez, F., & Castro-Martinez, E. (2008). Evaluating European regional innovation systems: Theory and evidence. Regional Studies, 42(8), 1163–1178. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701677736
Zurbriggen, C. (2011). Governance: An analysis of the literature and emerging developments. Management and Public Administration, 14(1), 1–25.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2026-07-01 (2)
- 2026-06-30 (1)
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
